Stage 01
Evidence
Four analysts, working separately
Four analysts each check one thing: the price chart, what investors are saying, the news, and the company’s finances. None of them sees the others’ work.
Market: trend vs 50/200-day averages, MACD, RSI, Bollinger, volume. Sentiment: social and retail positioning. News: company events, guidance, macro and sector catalysts. Fundamentals: revenue and EPS trend, margins, FCF, leverage, valuation.
Stage 02
Bull vs bear
Two researchers, one debate
One researcher argues to buy and one argues against. Each has to answer the other’s points using the analysts’ evidence and your own reasoning.
Adversarial rebuttal between bull and bear researchers, built on the four analyst reports and the user’s thesis. Each side must address the other’s strongest claim.
Stage 03
Research manager
Judges the debate
A research manager reads both sides, decides which case was stronger, and writes an investment plan.
Scores the debate on evidence rather than rhetoric, states which arguments carried, and produces a written investment plan for the trader.
Stage 04
Trader and risk desk
One trader, three risk analysts
A trader turns the plan into a position. Then aggressive, neutral and conservative risk analysts argue about how much to buy and where to get out.
Trader proposal with entry, stop loss and take profit. Three-way risk debate on position size relative to volatility, drawdown and event risk.
Stage 05
Portfolio manager
The final call
The portfolio manager weighs everything and makes the call: Buy, Hold or Sell, with the reasons in writing.
Final BUY / HOLD / SELL rating with written rationale, position sizing and risk levels. Every ruling is published as-is, including the SELLs.